jump to navigation

NY Times condemns Citizen Journalism, launching a futile civil war that neither side will win 11/30/07

Posted by Steve Boriss in Citizen journalism, NYTimes.
trackback

In a startling speech, NY Times Executive Editor Bill Keller launched a gratuitous civil war in the journalism community by grossly mischaracterizing the work of Jeff Jarvis, a capable and talented individual sincerely seeking to save Old Media from extinction. Keller falsely claimed that Jarvis had said that all bloggers were “Citizen Journalists” and they would ultimately replace mainstream media. Keller then set this strawman-of-his-own-making ablaze, haughtily declaring that no “newcomers” could match the Times’ “worldwide…corps of trained skilled reporters to witness events,” nor their “rigorous set of standards” and “code of accuracy and fairness.”

But unlike Jeff Jarvis in his defense of himself, I am willing to douse and defend that strawman with just a couple of minor tweaks. The correct and original definition of “blogs” (formerly “web logs”) was a site that presented information in reverse chronological order. This format has already largely replaced Old Media’s daily news snapshots. A newcomer named Matt Drudge has already proven that a blogger can get more online traffic than the NY Times. What’s more, Matt Drudge can draw from a much larger set of news sources around the world than the Times’ vaunted corps of trained reporters — whoever said that reporters are worthless unless they are on a news organization’s own payroll?

And the time has come to call the Press’ bluff on the “journalism of verification” that Keller invoked as a NY Times standard in his speech. In the closest thing there is to scripture in modern journalism, “The Elements of Journalism” by Kovach and Rosenstiel, we learn that when journalists were asked where they learned concepts of verification “overwhelmingly the answer was: by trial and error and on my own or from a friend [and rarely from] journalism school or from their editors.” In other words, everyone seems to have their own method of verification, including we can assume the Times’ Stalin-apologist Walter Duranty and fabricator Jayson Blair.

Jeff Jarvis is dead-right that the future of journalism is networked — where he is wrong is on who will be connected. In my view, there will be independent topic experts who create stories, and each will be networked to multiple separate entities that aggregate and edit those stories for their audiences. Right now, neither average citizens nor reporters are topic experts, nor are traditional editors aggregators. And yet, Old Media still resists change, even from allies like Jeff Jarvis. The NY Times has met the real enemy and it is themselves.

Comments»

1. Ydobon - 12/1/07

Steve Boriss wrote, “And the time has come to call the Press’ bluff on the ‘journalism of verification’

Ask and ye shall receive, from Instapundit, AMIDST A CLOUD OF INK, TNR RETRACTS AND FLEES THE SCENE.

Bob Owens comments: “Stay tuned. I’ll have much more later, including why Franklin Foer said nothing to justify keeping his job.

2. Ydobon - 12/1/07

Steve,

“Startling” is the word for Bill Keller’s speech. Please give it exposure on Pajamas Media. Excerpts can’t do it justice. People need to read it.

3. Steve Boriss - 12/1/07

Ydobon, Thanks for the suggestion. I may just do that.

4. Jake - 12/2/07

That last paragraph is right on. It amazes me (as an outside observer of journalism) that more people haven’t come to the same conclusion.

5. Ydobon - 12/2/07

Jake Barnes wrote, “That last paragraph is right on. It amazes me (as an outside observer of journalism) that more people haven’t come to the same conclusion.

Because it’s too big to see. It’s not the elephant in the room, it’s King Kong looking into the room.

You’ve heard of nano-bots? We’re all nano-journalists now. Or the elements of the human immune system. Self-organizing and self-targeting.

For a recent practical example I cooperated in see USA Today and WSJ Mask Serious Circulation Problems at Most Other Major Papers.

The implication is that current excess journalistic capacity on the Internet requires exponential notation to quantify.

P.S. Spyral Notebook’s a good blog, by the way. It’s just that I’m way oversupplied with good blogs at the moment.

6. Ed Driscoll.com - 12/2/07

All The News That’s Fit For Luddites

If it seems like the New York Times is the paper your grandmother reads because she doesn’t get the Internet, her VCR endlessly blinks 12:00, and if she’s heard of videogames at all, she equates them with Pong, there’s a…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: